M3
Slide 37
APPLIED ASSESSMENT
Applied assessment
Based on the sparring case from the previous screen. Four multiple-choice items, one short written reflection, one integration-model question, and an ethical prompt.
SCENARIO REMINDER
A 45-year-old man recently housed through a housing-led programme now faces:
Rent arrears due to delayed benefits
Untreated depression
Increased alcohol use
Missed employment appointments
No assigned case manager
Warning letter from housing provider
Part I – Conceptual Recognition (Applied Knowledge)
1. Which statement best describes this programme?
A. Full-fidelity Housing First
B. Traditional staircase model
C. Housing-led model with limited support intensity
D. Emergency shelter intervention
2. The primary systemic weakness in this case is:
A. Lack of housing supply
B. Lack of personal motivation
C. Insufficient cross-sector coordination
D. Absence of employment opportunities
3. Which intervention would most directly prevent eviction in this case?
A. Immediate employment requirement
B. Increased medication dosage
C. Early warning rent arrears system with coordinated response
D. Discharge from housing programme
Part II – System Analysis
Write a short response addressing in 5–7 sentences:
Identify two structural integration gaps in this scenario and explain how they interact to increase eviction risk.
Guidance:
Your answer should reference: Housing stability · Benefits administration · Health status · Support intensity
Possible structural gaps include:
Lack of multidisciplinary case management
No early warning mechanism for arrears
Fragmented communication between benefits office and housing provider
Absence of peer or community support
No integration between health services and tenancy sustainment
These gaps interact by allowing minor instability (benefit delay) to escalate into eviction risk due to lack of coordinated response.
Part III – Integration Design Challenge
Select one realistic improvement for this system:
A. Introduce mandatory abstinence requirements
B. Assign integrated case management with cross-sector authority
C. Reduce housing programme duration
D. Increase eviction speed
Part IV – Strategic Reflection
Briefly reflect:
If your local system experienced a similar case, where would fragmentation most likely occur — and why?