M4
Slide 17
CONTENT
Practical Illustration: Traditional vs. Rights-Based Integrated Model
Consider a hospital preparing to discharge a patient experiencing homelessness.
Two contrasting approaches show how system responsibility changes the outcome after discharge:
Traditional Model vs. Rights-Based Integrated Model
TRADITIONAL MODEL
Patient medically stabilised
Discharged to emergency shelter
No housing coordination
No benefits follow-up
No outpatient linkage
System responsibility ends at discharge.
Result:
Readmission within weeks
Ongoing instability
RIGHTS-BASED INTEGRATED MODEL
Discharge planning begins early
Housing pathway activated
Case manager coordinates benefits
Medical respite arranged if needed
Community follow-up scheduled
Data tracked for outcome monitoring
System responsibility extends beyond discharge.
Result:
Reduced readmission
Improved stability
Lower long-term public cost
CORE INSIGHT
Health and Housing as Rights – System Responsibility means:
Integrated care is not optional coordination — it is a structural commitment.
It requires:
Policy alignment
Inter-sectoral cooperation
Data-driven accountability
Advocacy
Inclusion of lived experience
Long-term stabilisation goals
Without this principle:
Integrated care remains project-based
Fragmentation persists
Equity goals fail
With this principle: Integrated health and social care becomes a sustainable system — not a temporary intervention.