M4 · Architecture
M4
Slide 17
CONTENT
Practical Illustration: Traditional vs. Rights-Based Integrated Model
Consider a hospital preparing to discharge a patient experiencing homelessness.
Two contrasting approaches show how system responsibility changes the outcome after discharge:
Traditional Model vs. Rights-Based Integrated Model
TRADITIONAL MODEL

Patient medically stabilised

Discharged to emergency shelter

No housing coordination

No benefits follow-up

No outpatient linkage

System responsibility ends at discharge.
Result:

Readmission within weeks

Ongoing instability

RIGHTS-BASED INTEGRATED MODEL

Discharge planning begins early

Housing pathway activated

Case manager coordinates benefits

Medical respite arranged if needed

Community follow-up scheduled

Data tracked for outcome monitoring

System responsibility extends beyond discharge.
Result:

Reduced readmission

Improved stability

Lower long-term public cost

CORE INSIGHT
Health and Housing as Rights – System Responsibility means:
Integrated care is not optional coordination — it is a structural commitment.
It requires:

Policy alignment

Inter-sectoral cooperation

Data-driven accountability

Advocacy

Inclusion of lived experience

Long-term stabilisation goals

Without this principle:

Integrated care remains project-based

Fragmentation persists

Equity goals fail

With this principle: Integrated health and social care becomes a sustainable system — not a temporary intervention.