M4
Slide 29
APPLIED ASSESSMENT
10–12 MIN
Applied Assessment Task
Based on the sparring case from the previous screen. Two multiple-choice items, one short analytical response, one strategic decision with justification, and a reflective bridge.
SCENARIO REMINDER
A mid-sized European city has:
• Public hospital
• Primary care clinics
• Housing First programme
• NGOs providing outreach
• Small ACT team
• No medical respite
• No structured discharge protocol
Patients continue cycling through emergency departments and losing housing.
Part I – Integration Recognition
1. Which integration gap is most structurally significant in this scenario?
A. Lack of primary care capacity
B. Absence of formal hospital discharge coordination
C. Lack of shelters
D. Insufficient mental health medication
2. Which international model most directly addresses the discharge-to-street cycle?
A. Toronto ACT
B. Dublin Inclusion Health
C. Pathway UK
D. BHCHP Medical Respite
(C is also considered correct in a broader interpretation.)
Part II – Analytical Short Response
In 5–7 sentences:
Identify two integration maturity weaknesses in this city and explain how they interact to destabilise housing outcomes.
Guidance:
Consider: case management intensity, discharge planning, ACT capacity, data monitoring.
Part III – Strategic Decision-Making
You have funding to introduce only ONE structural integration mechanism in the first year. Which should you prioritise?
A. Expand ACT capacity
B. Create formal hospital discharge protocol
C. Develop medical respite unit
D. Implement shared data monitoring system
Explain your choice in 4–5 sentences.
(There is no single correct answer — justification quality matters.)
Part IV – Reflective Bridge
Briefly reflect:
Which of the four IHSC principles is currently weakest in this system?
Whole-Person Integration
Low-Barrier Access
Trust-Based Practice
System Responsibility